MODERN MYTHOLOGY: Star Trek: TNG, “The Masterpiece Society” (1991)

Revelations On What Being Judgmental Really Means

In “The Masterpiece Society” (1991, Season 5), Geordi LaForge is confronted with eugenics–the discrimination of genes to pick out what seems perfect. The Masterpiece Society is a community that lives an enclosed biosphere, a bubble. They believe in genetic screening and discrimination, so they throw out any embryo that does not live up to their standards of perfection. But with an astronomical threat coming their way, they need to “shore up” their enclosure so that their biosphere won’t crack. They must seek help from other engineers–they enlist the help of the crew from the Enterprise NCC 1701-D.

Geordi, the chief engineer on the Enterprise, goes inside the biosphere. He wears a visor–his eyes–because he was born blind. Without question or hesitation, he goes onto the planet to help this masterpiece society fix their biosphere so that they do not perish. In the course of his helping their chief engineer, he has a discussion about their methods of selecting the “perfect” people.

He says that he would have been “terminated as a fertilized cell” because his genetic composition has a blindness gene. The chief engineer, a woman, responds that they don’t want anyone to “suffer with disabilities.” So he responds, “who gave them the right to decide whether or not I should be here, whether or not I have something to contribute?” She has no answer.

As the story progresses, Geordi figures out how to “shore up” the walls of their biosphere. The answer is in his visor. He says to the masterpiece engineer, “If the answer to all of this is in a visor created for a blind man who would have never existed in your society…no offense intended.” Human ingenuity won the day. A human’s ability to be creative, embracing the challenge of disability as an opportunity to grow, saves the “perfect” society. Weakness overcomes the strong.

This episode not only speaks against the idea that we would be better off choosing certain embryos for their genes, but it also speaks against the other extreme–survival of the fittest–since Geordi has a weakened nature, but he has learned how to prevail against his own weakness. Genetic engineering, an extreme, is unnatural selection. In this society, it has turned an extreme idea into a dogma, a dogma that only perfect genes make perfect people. What they have failed to realize in embracing this false dogma of perfection is that genes are accessories and true masterpieces generally come from those who are most weak.

Turning the idea of perfection on its head, Geordi is perfect in his response to aid those who need help; he is perfect in his ability to use his disability as one of his greatest strengths–he is perfect in his generosity and courage. His parents had the perfect response in embracing the fruit of their conjugal act, unafraid of the unknown possibilities. The imperfect, however, respond with judging others as undesireable, not equal in dignity because of genetic flaws. Their judgmentalism, their discrimination based on genetic codes, makes them cowardly and blind to the creative possibilities that are inherent to each human.

For you were called for freedom, brothers. But do not use this freedom as an opportunity for the flesh; rather serve one another through love. For the whole law is fulfilled in this one statement, namely, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” But if you go on biting and devouring one another, beware that you are not consumed by one another. –Galatians 5:13-15

Not many of you were wise by human standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth. Rather, God chose the foolish of the world to shame the wise, and God chose the weak of the world to shame the strong, and God chose the lowly and despised of the world, those who count for nothing, to reduce to nothing those who are something, so that no human being might boast before God. –1 Corinthians 1:26-29

“My grace is sufficient for you, for power is made perfect in weakness.” I will rather boast most gladly of my weaknesses, in order that the power of Christ may dwell with me. Therefore, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and constraints, for the sake of Christ; for when I am weak, then I am strong.–2 Corinthians 12:9-10

Certain attempts to influence chromosomic or genetic inheritance are not therapeutic but are aimed at producing human beings selected according to sex or other predetermined qualities. Such manipulations are contrary to the personal dignity of the human being and his integrity and identity” which are unique and unrepeatable (2275).

Techniques involving only the married couple (homologous artificial insemination and fertilization) are perhaps less reprehensible, yet remain morally unacceptable. They dissociate the sexual act from the procreative act. The act which brings the child into existence is no longer an act by which two persons give themselves to one another, but one that “entrusts the life and identity of the embryo into the power of doctors and biologists and establishes the domination of technology over the origin and destiny of the human person. Such a relationship of domination is in itself contrary to the dignity and equality that must be common to parents and children.” “Under the moral aspect procreation is deprived of its proper perfection when it is not willed as the fruit of the conjugal act, that is to say, of the specific act of the spouses’ union…Only respect for the link between the meaning of the conjugal act and respect for the unity of the human being make possible procreation in conformity with the dignity of the person.” (2377)

The Star Trek mythology has discovered the error in thinking that genetic engineering and discrimination is a good move for science because going in that direction is based on a false and superficial concept of human perfection. It puts humanity into a bubble that will eventually pop since it is both blind to true perfection and cowardly in facing the unknown.

“The Masterpiece Society” develops a theme that is revisited several times in The Next Generation series–if and whether technology should be used for or against the dignity of the person. Judgmental people would say, “yes, let technology take us over because we suck.” A person who is not judgmental would say, “Let us be the master of technology by making choices that uphold the inherent human dignity of each and every person.” It is time to revisit what authentic progress means.

Why Mythology Is Good…

Humans love stories[1]. We listen to stories, read stories, watch stories. Many of us would like to have our own story. Mythology is a type of story. It is a wonderful way to explore ideas, explore the consequences of certain ideas, reveal human nature, and maybe even get people to think in a new direction. With mythology, writers can creatively grasp certain universal truths that are otherwise hidden. In short, the myth tends to know what is unknowable[2]. How does mythology do this?

In the words of Chaucer[3], the best story is that of “best sentence and moost solas.” It is not only woven together well, but it also has more to offer. Sir Philip Sidney[4] suggests that “Poesy [story, literature] therefore is an art of imitation, for so Aristotle termeth it in the word mimesis—that is to say, a representing, counterfeiting, or figuring forth—to speak metaphorically, a speaking picture—with this end, to teach and delight.” Good stories not only entertain, but they also teach something. Mythology has a profound way of doing this. This series is devoted to delving into the mythology created by movie and other visual media makers.

Christological will be a frequently referenced concept.

The education of conscience guarantees freedom and engenders peace of heart (1784).


[1] Jeff Cavins’ The Bible Timeline: The Story of Salvation

[2] Theology of the Body reference notes, p. 91

[3] from the “General Prologue” in Canterbury Tales

[4]  from “The Defense of Poesy”

For further reading, here is another post called “Is Perfection the Ridiculous Expectation of the Insane?

About these ads

About lamehousewife

poetry, articles, thoughts, and quotes... on a quest to be authentic in my motherhood, sisterhood, and daughterhood, but i can tend to become Juvenalian sometimes, maybe in writing but also in life, reading Swift's "A Modest Proposal" as if i were hearing a friend speak to me about the how ridiculous some ideas can become, especially when they begin to drift into reality, mocking all of us really... i identify with Mary Magdalene, James, and Peter and am extremely grateful for that woman who said, "Yes!"...oh and i can be pretty lame...blessings to you, dear reader...pray for a single mother, her children, and the father of her children today!
This entry was posted in Modern Mythology and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to MODERN MYTHOLOGY: Star Trek: TNG, “The Masterpiece Society” (1991)

  1. Jeff Walker says:

    You’ve done it again. Excellent points, all of them. I had forgotten about this episode.

  2. larryzb says:

    Dear lamehousewife,

    Your writing is not lame. Keep up the good work!

  3. Beverly says:

    Hello, Lamehousewife. This is James from Biltrix, commenting vicariously through another blog to let you know that you have been nominated for some awards. Please, follow this link for the award/s: http://lifevigil.wordpress.com/2012/08/02/wow-blogger-awards-you-shouldnt-have/. If you choose to accept any of these awards, I would be most honored. God bless!

  4. Pingback: MODERN MYTHOLOGY: Star Trek: TNG, “The Inner Light” (1992) | The Lamehousewife Blog

I appreciate your thoughts...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s